WhatsAppinfo@ri-hub.it
Ri-Hub Junior

A Child Who Falls Often: When It Is Normal and When It Is Not

Team Ri-Hub15 min lettura

Revisione clinica: Daniele Carretto, Fisioterapista (Albo 2019) · Pubblicato il 1 settembre 2026

Un momento gioioso catturato con una famiglia che trascorre del tempo insieme a casa.
Condividi

At the park you do something you do not tell anyone: you count. One, two, three. The third time the other parents turned round, and you laughed first to shake off the stares. Then at home you typed four words into the search bar and ended up here.

Here is the piece that matters most, straight away: falling is not a symptom, it is the method. And the number of falls is almost always the least useful piece of information you have. What counts is which side they fall on, in what context, and above all whether they are improving. Then there are three situations in which the doctor is needed straight away, and I will spell them out clearly later.

Seventeen falls an hour: the number nobody told you

For a hundred years the walking of children has been studied in a laboratory, on a straight, uniform corridor. Then a research group recorded children between 12 and 19 months during free play, the real thing, and counted everything. The average: 2,368 steps and 17 falls an hour.

Read it again: seventeen an hour, not a day. One fall every three and a half minutes. If you have spent the last month thinking that yours fell too much, you did not have the right comparison.

Two more things come out of the same study. The first: novice walkers fell as often as experienced crawlers, not more. The child does not move on to walking because they have become more stable: they move on because walking takes them further and faster for the same level of risk.

The second is the one you need: once walking has started, everything improves together: more steps, more distance, fewer falls, and those who walked better spontaneously walked more and fell less. Practice is the improvement: walking is learned through huge amounts of distributed and varied practice, that is, by falling.

How many falls are expected, age by age

Here I have to be honest about a big limit in the literature, because you will find very confident tables online with nothing behind them: beyond 19 months, an hourly count measured like that does not exist. Nobody can tell you how many falls a day "are normal" at three. What has been measured, instead, is the trajectory of balance:

Age What is expected What the data show
12–19 months Continuous falls, in every context About 17 falls/hour in free play, decreasing with experience
2–3 years Falls while running, when changing direction, on uneven ground No measured count at this age: the direction matters, not the number
4–6 years Falls concentrated on new skills: bike, jumps, stairs, new shoes At 4 they rebalance within one sense, not yet between different senses
7 years and up Rare falls in everyday life, present in sport Some static balance tests "hit a ceiling": almost everyone passes them

It is worth pausing on the last row. In a study of 534 Irish children aged 4 to 15, static balance tests improved with age, clearly after the seventh or eighth year, and after the age of 7 some single-leg and tandem stance tests showed a ceiling effect: practically everyone passed them. In the large reference study of 1,000 people aged 3 to 101, functional performance, balance included, grows throughout childhood and adolescence and then levels off.

The practical meaning: before the age of 7 balance is a building site still under way, and falling has many innocent explanations; after that, falling often in everyday life, not in sport but in everyday life, weighs more.

There is also a reason why little ones fall in situations that seem trivial to you: they use their senses differently from you. A study of children aged 4 to 10 measured how postural control reweights visual and touch information as the situation changes. Already at 4 they can reweight within a single sensory channel, but the ability to reweight between different channels appears only in the older ones, and grows with age. Put simply: at four, the balance between one sense and another is not yet ready, and when the situation changes, in the dark, on uneven ground, while talking and walking at the same time, your child has less margin. They are not distracted: the tools are still arriving.

Due bambini esplorano un rigoglioso giardino domestico, circondati da una vegetazione vibrante e fiori.

The three questions worth more than the count

If you stop counting, what do you look at? Three things, in this order.

1. Is it improving, stuck, or getting worse? This is the question that carries the most weight. A child who is learning falls less than three months ago, even if they still fall a lot. One who has been stuck for months deserves a look. One who is getting worse or has lost something they could do before is the only situation that admits no waiting.

2. In what context do they fall? Running, on uneven grass, on stairs, in new shoes, when tired at seven in the evening: all expected. Falling on the smooth floor at home, walking slowly, with no obstacle, is different information. The first is a child at the edge of their abilities; the second does not even manage the easy task.

3. How do they fall? Watch the hands. A child who falls and protects themselves (hands out, head protected, gets up alone and sets off again) has protective reactions that work. A child who falls like a dead weight, hits their face because the arms do not get there, or gets up propping themselves with obvious effort, is telling you something else. It is not the fall: it is the half second afterwards.

Asymmetry beats frequency. Always.

If I had to keep just one sentence from this article, it would be this: a child who falls twenty times a day at random, a bit to one side and a bit to the other, is almost always a child who is learning; one who falls three times a day but always on the same side is a child to have looked at.

Asymmetry is not a question of quantity, it is a question of pattern. An asymmetric gait has a clinical name, limping, and paediatric literature treats it this way: in most children it is due to a mild, self-limiting event, a bruise, a strain, a sprain, but it is still always a pathological finding, requiring an accurate assessment. The two statements do not contradict each other: almost always it is nothing, and in any case it is looked at.

The signs of asymmetry to recognise, in practical terms:

  • always falls on the same side, or always trips over the same foot;
  • drags a foot, or puts it down differently from the other;
  • holds one hand more closed than the other, or uses it much less;
  • limps, even a little, even only when tired;
  • hurts always in the same place.

On asymmetry in developmental milestones, the one that shows up even before walking, the full picture is in Not crawling and not walking: the real windows of motor milestones.

When falling is coordination (and how to tell)

There is a group of children whose balance is measurably more fragile with no disease underneath: those with a developmental coordination disorder. And balance is not a detail of the picture, it is a central part of it.

A systematic review with meta-analysis pooled 31 studies, 1,152 children with this disorder and 1,103 typically developing peers, with an average age of 10.4 years. On the balance subscale of the most widely used motor test, the standardised mean difference was 1.63 (95% CI: 1.30–1.97), a wide gap. On force plates they swayed more standing with their eyes closed (standardised difference 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32–0.78). And they showed delayed anticipatory postural adjustments: the body prepares for the movement a moment after the movement has already begun.

This last detail explains a lot of what you see at home: the child is not losing their balance, they are not preparing it in time. And in the meta-analysis that delay was seen regardless of the task: it is not the difficulty of a particular gesture, it is the way the movement starts.

Be careful, however, how this label is reached, because the criterion is not clumsiness. The international clinical practice recommendations, thirty-five of them, drawn up by a multidisciplinary panel, are clear on two points: the difficulty must significantly interfere with daily activities, and other conditions must be ruled out. It is not "how much they fall": it is how much it takes away from the child.

If what you recognise is wider than falling, such as the ball they cannot catch, the laces that never get tied, the illegible notebook, the right place is Clumsy child: when coordination is a disorder. There the topic is coordination in all its forms; here we stay on falling.

The three situations that call for the doctor, not the physiotherapist

This is the uncomfortable part, and I will keep it short. There are three, and none of them resolves by waiting.

1. Weakness that gets worse, especially when climbing

The signal is not balance: it is strength against gravity. Difficulty getting up from the floor (and to do it they climb up their own legs with their hands), difficulty climbing stairs, running in an odd way or no longer running as before, and the clear sense that things are not improving.

In Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a rare condition that affects almost only boys, the figures on diagnostic delay say something directly to parents. An audit of 122 children in nine specialist centres measured an average age of 36.4 months when the first symptoms appeared, 49.9 months at the first contact with a healthcare professional and 53.9 months at the definitive diagnosis: on average 24.2 months from the first symptom to the diagnosis.

The key data is where that delay lies. From the first symptom to the first healthcare contact took 21.1 months; from the doctor to the diagnosis, 4.6 months. The long part of the wait happens before anyone asks for an opinion. In another study based on population surveillance data, the first signs appeared at a median age of 2 years, with the definitive diagnosis at 4.92 years in children born at term.

A review focused on early signs reaches the most practical conclusion possible: the diagnosis is often not made before the age of four, and the best strategy is a simple blood test, CK (creatine kinase), done early in all boys with signs of developmental delay and abnormal motor tests at routine paediatric visits.

It is one blood sample: if there is doubt, it is taken within a week. And to be honest about the other part: these conditions are not treated online, they require specialist centres and in-person assessments.

2. Loss of skills already acquired

Normal motor development fluctuates: a child learning something new often seems to get worse at what they already could do, and that is physiological. But losing is different: they walked and no longer walk, they climbed stairs and no longer manage them, they spoke and now speak less. A genuine regression is not watched: it is taken to the paediatrician, this week.

3. Falls with loss of consciousness

If your child occasionally loses consciousness and ends up on the floor, that is not a fall: it is a different event, belonging to a different chapter. Syncope is common: one review reports that 15% of children have had at least one episode before the age of 18, and in the great majority of cases it is benign and reflex. But there are dedicated paediatric guidelines, with a classification of causes and specific postural tests (active standing, tilt test, sitting tests), because the assessment must be done in order and not by eye. And epileptic seizures are not syncope: they must be told apart with care.

The physiotherapist has nothing to do with this here. The paediatrician does.

A fourth element, which is not an emergency but should not be set aside: if, as well as falling, they often walk on tiptoe. At five and a half, toe walking affects about 2% of typically developing children, but rises to 41% among those with a neuropsychiatric diagnosis or a developmental delay. It is almost always idiopathic and means nothing else: the full picture is in Child who walks on tiptoe: when to really worry, but the combination with frequent falls should be shown to a doctor.

What actually trains balance

First the limit, otherwise what follows is worth less: almost all the solid evidence on "training balance in children" comes from children with developmental coordination disorder, not from the child who simply falls more than average. Applying it to the other case is reasonable, but not proven.

That said, the numbers are there. A 2025 meta-analysis of 32 randomised controlled studies in children aged 3 to 17 found that movement-based interventions improve overall motor skills (g = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.48–1.52), balance function (g = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.17–0.97), muscle function (g = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.17–1.66) and performance in daily activities (g = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.23–1.19).

Two things, however, need saying in full. The same analysis did not find significant improvements in psychosocial factors (g = 0.71; 95% CI: from −0.08 to 1.50) or in participation: the child becomes more capable, but does not for that reason feel better or play more with others. That part is worked on separately. And the subgroup analysis says what to choose: task-oriented training improved overall motor skills, balance and performance in activities. Not abstract abilities: the real gesture.

Translated into what to do this week, without equipment:

  • Change the ground, not the repetitions: grass, sand, gravel, sofa cushions on the floor. Control is built on variety.
  • Train changes of direction, not the straight line: chasing each other, stopping on command, going round a chair. In life you fall while turning.
  • Jumps and landings. Step down from a low step and stand still for three seconds: that half second of preparation is what arrives late in children who are struggling.
  • Stairs, every day, alternating feet: one of the most complete movements there is, and nobody calls it exercise.
  • One leg, but played: throwing a ball to a foot, pulling trousers on standing up, brushing teeth on one leg.
  • Barefoot at home, when it makes sense: more information from the foot.
  • Less time standing still. Hours spent sitting are not hours of practice.

What is not needed

  • Counting the falls: the number on its own discriminates nothing and keeps you anxious.
  • Taking away sport or protecting them more. It is the instinctive reaction and the wrong one: less movement means less practice.
  • Buying insoles "for balance" without an assessment that indicates them.
  • Waiting in the face of an asymmetry, a loss of skills or a loss of consciousness: those three do not get better on their own.
  • Making them exercise against their will. A child who hates exercise stops moving, and you have lost twice.

What we can do, and what we cannot

A child who falls should be watched while moving in their own environment: their floor, their shoes, their stairs, not on a couch where everything is smooth and regular. For this reason a video call works well here: you show us how they walk, run, climb the stairs and get up from the floor, and we look at the pattern, the symmetry and the protective reactions.

With Ri-Hub Junior you start with a free twenty-minute introductory consultation with a physiotherapist on the Italian professional register who works with children and teenagers: we tell you whether you are within normal limits, what to change at home, or whether it is better to see the paediatrician first. Up to age 10 sessions last 50 minutes and cost 59,90 €; from age 11 to 18 the standard session at 29,90 € applies.

And if there is a complex neurological or neuromuscular condition behind it, the right place is not us: those pathways require specialist centres and in-person assessments, and we prefer to tell you on the first call.

In the meantime, the most useful thing you can do from tonight is to stop counting and start watching which side they fall on.

How much movement a child of that age really needs: movement in young people.

Sources

Last source check: September 2026.

Domande frequenti

How many falls a day are normal for a young child?

Many more than you imagine. The first study to count them really during free play, and not in a laboratory, measured an average of 2,368 steps and 17 falls an hour in children between 12 and 19 months. Seventeen an hour, not a day: one every three and a half minutes of play. To be honest, beyond 19 months a count this precise does not exist in the literature, so nobody can give you a threshold number for a child of three or five. That is exactly why the number matters less than the direction: if, over the weeks, they fall less, they are within normal limits.

How do I tell a child who is learning from one with a real difficulty?

Look at three things, in this order. The direction: in the study of children between 12 and 19 months, after they began walking, the children took more steps, covered more ground and fell less. Improvement is the signal. The context: falling on new terrain, while running, on stairs, while learning something is expected; falling on the smooth floor at home, standing still, for no reason, is not. And symmetry: falling always on the same side weighs far more than falling often. If the direction is upwards, the context is learning and there is no asymmetry, it is almost always a child who is learning.

They always fall on the same side: does it matter?

It is the single most important sign in the whole article, more than frequency. An asymmetric gait has a precise clinical definition, limping, and in the paediatric literature the point is clear: in most children limping is due to a minor, self-limiting event, a bruise, a sprain, a strain, but it is still always a pathological finding that requires an accurate assessment. Put simply: in most cases it is nothing serious, but it must still be looked at. This is not a contradiction, it is the correct way to handle an asymmetry.

Every so often they fall and seem to lose consciousness for a few seconds. Is it the same thing?

No, and it is the most important distinction to make straight away. That is not a balance fall: it is a transient loss of consciousness that ends with the child on the ground, and it belongs to a completely different chapter of medicine. Syncope is common, one review reports that 15% of children have had at least one episode before the age of 18, and in most cases it is benign, but there is a dedicated paediatric diagnostic pathway, with guidelines that define the classification of causes and postural tests. Epileptic seizures, then, are yet another thing and must be told apart from syncope. If it happens even once, this is a matter for the paediatrician, not the physiotherapist.

They fall often and walk on tiptoe: should I worry?

It is a combination worth having looked at, not ignored. At five and a half years, walking on tiptoe affects about 2% of typically developing children, but rises to 41% among children with a neuropsychiatric diagnosis or a developmental delay. Put simply: in most cases it is idiopathic, meaning without an identifiable cause, and it does not mean anything more; but that difference between 2% and 41% is the reason why, when toe walking is persistent and comes with other things, such as frequent falls, difficulty climbing stairs, or language or social development out of step, the medical assessment should be done and not put off.

When should I think of a muscle problem?

When the problem is getting up, not balance: difficulty rising from the floor, climbing stairs, running, and the sense that things are getting worse rather than better. In the diagnostic pathway for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, an audit of 122 children in nine centres measured an average of 36.4 months until the first symptoms appeared, 49.9 months until the first contact with a healthcare professional and 53.9 months until the definitive diagnosis. The striking part is where the delay lies: 21.1 months on average before getting to the doctor, against 4.6 months from the doctor to the diagnosis. It is a rare condition, but the first test is a simple blood sample for CK, and the reviews recommend doing it early in boys with signs of developmental delay.

Can balance really be trained? What works?

Yes, with one honest limitation to state: almost all the solid evidence comes from children with developmental coordination disorder, not from the child who simply falls. In that population, a 2025 meta-analysis of 32 randomised controlled studies found that movement-based interventions improve overall motor skills (g = 1.00), balance function (g = 0.57) and performance in daily activities (g = 0.71). But the same analysis found no significant improvements in psychosocial aspects or in participation. And the subgroup analysis indicates what to choose: task-oriented training, that is training the real movement, not abstract abilities.

Dal singolo esercizio al percorso

Questi esercizi sono generici. Il tuo no.

Quelli che hai appena letto valgono per tutti, e per questo non valgono per nessuno in particolare. Un fisioterapista iscritto all'Albo guarda il tuo caso nel primo colloquio — gratuito, venti minuti — e da lì costruisce il programma su di te: da casa quando basta, in uno studio vicino a te quando servono le mani. Il dolore che torna non toglie solo il movimento: toglie il sonno, la pazienza, la voglia di uscire di casa. Rimetterti in movimento è il nostro mestiere.

Trova il tuo fisioterapista →

Hai solo una domanda? Scrivila su WhatsApp →

Fino a 10 anni 50 minuti a 59,90€ · dagli 11 ai 18 sedute da 29,90€ · nessun abbonamento

Ri-Hub ti mette in contatto con un fisioterapista online: primo colloquio gratuito in videochiamata con un professionista iscritto all'Albo, che ti segue per tutto il percorso. E se al tuo caso servono le mani, è chi ti segue a dirtelo e a mandarti da uno dei nostri, vicino a te. Se preferisci partire dalla tua zona, guarda il fisioterapista vicino a te, città per città. Se ti stai chiedendo quanto costa una seduta di fisioterapia, abbiamo confrontato studio privato, domicilio, ticket SSN e online.

#bambini#età evolutiva#equilibrio#cadute#sviluppo motorio

Articoli correlati